If the particular section is silent on the point, then the courts will look at other sections in the Act. Fault: Criminal Law Flashcards by Tom Robjohns | Brainscape Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. Throughout the Act it then states whether the the strict liability rule applies to the various offences of contempt of court. It is not known how Winzar came to be taken to the hospital on a stretcher, but commentators on this case point out that there may be an element of fault in Winzars conduct. The first is Larsonneur (1933) 24 Cr App R 74. On appeal, it was held that it was not an offer for sale but was merely an Invitation to Treat. in Storkwain (1986) the offence carried a maximum sentence of two, years imprisonment. It was in fact unfit and the butcher was convicted of the offence of exposing unfit meat for sale. There are various aspects to the exercise. Law GCSE: Case Studies Flashcards | Quizlet I do not think it does. P and O escaped liability because the controlling mind could not be identified and hence, no director was held responsible for the event. In addition, the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 made it unlawful for shops to display the price of an item contrary to the price showed at the point of sale. The police found cannabis at the farmhouse, and the defendant was charged with being concerned in the management of premises used for the purpose of smoking cannabis resin. Section 13 has two important features. The maximum of two years cannot therefore be said to be tailormade for a contravention of regulation 3 by a shopkeeper. Issues of social concern cover any, activity which is a potential danger to public health, safety or morals. In order to decide whether an offence is one of strict liability, the courts start by assuming that mens rea is required, but they are prepared to interpret the offence as one of strict liability if Parliament has expressly or by implication indicated this in the relevant statute.